Background
![]() |
Approximately 70 million years ago a catastrophic
event took place on Earth that resulted in the mass extinction of numerous
species of dinosaurs. We know this because we find lots of dinosaur fossils
prior to this date and then very few after this date. Do you have a preferred
hypothesis on why the dinosaurs became extinct? Numerous researchers have
developed theories on the extinction of the dinosaurs. There are a number
of theories. The debate about why the dinosaurs died out took a leap forward in the early eighties. In 1980 physicist Luis Alvarez and his son, geologist Walter Alvarez, both of the University of California, were working together on a geology expedition in Italy (pictured left). They accidentally discovered a band of sedimentary rock that contained unusually high levels of a rare element, iridium. Chemical dating techniques put the rock at around 65 million years old. Coincidentally -- or not, that is around the time the dinosaurs died out (Alvarez et al, 1980). |
| The
research team hypothesised that the iridium, which was in a very even,
widespread distribution (not just in Italy), was the result of a giant
asteroid that hit Earth, sending smoke, dust, and iridium into the atmosphere.
That smokescreen blocked the sun, lowering the earth's temperature, killing
plants (but not seeds or roots), and eventually many species of animals,
including dinosaurs. The plant-eaters died out first, followed by the
meat-eaters that would have eaten them. Smaller mammals and birds could
survive the cold, desolate period because of their fur, feathers, and
ability to eat seeds, roots, and decaying vegetation. The pollution eventually
settled to the ground, forming a thin layer of iridium.
This theory became the one accepted scientific community and
passed into popular culture as being the definitive truth. However even
today the theory is still subject to debate (Rincon, 2004). |
![]() |
Luis Alvarez was an extraordinary man. He worked developing the first atomic bomb at the end of WW2. He was actually on the Enola Gay when it dropped the bomb on Hiroshima. There are many reports of how sickened he was by the product of his efforts. He assisted the Warren Commission that investigated the assassination of President Kennedy. He died of cancer in 1988 (WGHB, 1998).
Activity = Activité|
Other theories of why the dinosaurs died
out can be found at the following. D’autres théories expliquant la disparition des dinosaures
- Read about the rise and fall of the dinosaurs. Does
it surprise you to find out that dinosaurs were going extinct over
millions of years and there was more than one extinction? Lisez le texte sur l’apparition et le déclin des dinosaures.
Etes-vous surpris de constater que l’extinction des dinosaures s’est
déroulée sur plusieurs millions d’années et qu’il y a eu plus d’une
extinction ? |
Additional information = Informations
complémentaires
http://filebox.vt.edu/artsci/geology/mclean/Dinosaur_Volcano_Extinction/
This site is aimed at a little higher level. However, it does pit one theory against another. Which
of the theories do you think comes out on top?
Ce site contient des informations un peu plus complexes.
Cependant, il mesure bien les différentes
théories les unes par rapport aux autres. Selon vous, laquelle de ces théories
est la plus convaincante ?
‘Those who do not learn the lessons of History are destined to re-live it’ is
a phrase often used in relation to the Social Subjects. Are there lessons to
learn from the story of the dinosaurs? If so, what are they? Do you think that
Alvarez’s switch from developing weapons of mass destruction to investigating
extinction events was co-incidental or could the two be related?
“Ceux qui ne tirent pas les leçons
de l’histoire sont destinés à en subir à nouveau les conséquences”. Cette expression
est souvent employée en relation avec l’étude des Sciences sociales. Peut-on
tirer des leçons de l’histoire des dinosaures ? Pensez-vous que le fait
qu’Alvarez soit passé du développement de la bombe atomique à la recherche sur
l’extinction des dinosaures soit une coïncidence ou les deux sujets peuvent-ils
être liés ?
What implications does the examination
of the science surrounding the theories relating to the extinction of the dinosaurs
have for us as science educators?
We need to remember that science is fallible
and that scientists themselves are human and not necessarily objective, analytical
automatons. On wider issues when getting children to engage in scientific debate
we need to get them to keep open minds on scientific issues so they remain critical
readers of scientific ‘fact’. In the classroom our science teaching should open
up issues to scrutiny and debate and thus equip children with the scientific
skills to critically examine and debate life issues that may effect them in
their lifetime such as MMR, BSE, GM Crops.
Quelles implications l’étude des théories sur
la disparition des dinosaures peut-elle avoir pour nous éducateurs scientifiques ?
Nous devons nous souvenir que la science n’est pas infaillible et que les scientifiques
eux-mêmes sont des humains et non des automates objectifs et analytiques. De
manière plus générale, lorsque l’on engage les jeunes dans un débat scientifique,
on doit s’assurer qu’ils gardent un regard ouvert et critique face au « fait »
scientifique. Dans la classe, l’enseignement scientifique doit être l’occasion
d’ examiner et de débattre de problèmes
de société auxquels les jeunes peuvent être confrontés durant leur vie tels
que le vaccin ROR, l’encéphalopathie spongiforme bovine (« maladie de la
vache folle ») ou les cultures génétiquement
modifiées.
References
- Alvarez,
L. W., Alvarez, W., Asaro, F., and Michel, H. V., 1980, Extraterrestrial cause
for the Cretaceous-Tertiary extinction: Science, v. 208, p. 1095-1108
- Rincon,
P. (2004) Dinosaur Impact Theory Challenged. Retrieved from: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/3520837.stm
(1st March 2004)
- WGBH (1998) Louis Alvarez 1911-1998. Retrieved
from: http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/aso/databank/entries/boalva.html
(2nd March, 2004)