MIRABAUD Anaïs 1°S3, PREVOT Lucie 1°S1
Main question
Experiment protocols
Results (Chemical and biological characteristics)
Interpretation
Conclusion
Bibliography
Annexe : Excessive eutrophication examples
Observations:
Pollution is relative in many ways. For example, polluted water can affect
humans but cannot harm fish. And water which looks polluted because it is
not clear can be drinking water for us.
Water pollution is characterised by its cause (accidents, waste and residue
elimination and over excessive use of water), its type (physical, chemical,
bacteriological and radio-active), its size (local or extensive, occasional
or seasonal), its source (farms and industries) (table 1) in space and time.
Table 1. Description of the types, natures and sources of pollution:
|
Types of pollution |
Nature of the pollutants |
Source or causal agents |
|
1. Physical |
Thermal pollution, hot water rejection Radioactive pollution, radio-isotopes |
Electric power-stations Nuclear installations |
|
2. Chemical |
-Fertilisers : nitrates, phosphates -Metals and toxic metalloids: mercury, cadmium,
lead, aluminium, arsenic, etc… -Pesticides, organic chlorine matters and other
synthesized organic matters : insecticide, weed-killers, fungicides, chlorine
solvent -Detergent : tensioactive agents -Hydrocarbon oils: crude oil and their derived
(fuels…) |
-Agriculture(washing powder) -Industry, agriculture, combustion (acids rains) -Agriculture (industry) -Domestic effluent -Oil tanker industry, transport -Industry -Industry (some with dissipation uses) |
|
3. Organic matters |
Fermentable Glucids, fat proteins, protids |
Agricultural, domestic, food- processing, wooden
(paper mill) effluents |
|
4. Microbiological |
Bacteria, virus, fungi |
Urban effluents, breeding, food- processing
sector |
|
5. Biological |
Pollution by the migration of exotic species,
disturbing local species |
Boats throw water which comes from a different
zone and contains different species out in an area. |
Water pollution is also characterised by its consequence (for
example in the case of animals and plants).
Between 1976 and 1991, the toxic matter rejections decreased by 62%. The agglomeration
rejects 49% of these matters, which can be oxides, contained in the used water.
The new processes to eradicate pollutants are the elimination of nitrates
and nitrites, the using of activated carbon against the pesticide, and the
membrane filtration.
Pollution can seriously disturb and poison, not only the current fauna and
flora, but also other animals of the food chain. To control polluted areas
as best as we can, and prevent these consequences, we must first identify
the affected zones, and the degree of pollution that they contain.
In fact, the concern for environmental protection dates back
to much longer than we can think of. The Liebig's law had indeed been made
in 1840 :
The Liebig's law of the lowest limit required of essential materials means
that The growth of an organism is dependent on the amount of essential material
which is presented to it in the minimum quantity, applicable only under steady-state
conditions (i.e. when matter and energy inflows and outflows are balanced
and the material that is "limiting" does not change from one material to another).
Leibig's Law was extended by Shelford (1913) to describe not only the
lowest limit required of essential materials, but also the upper limit of
tolerance of these materials. Organisms have an ecological minimum and maximum
which represent the limits of tolerance. (See the bibliography)
We have organisations which supervise industries and people in order to ensure
that they respect the laws. The Federal Republic of Germany, France,
Luxembourg, the Netherlands and Switzerland, respect the same Convention
Concerning the Frontier Waters Against Pollution, conventions which date back
to 1972.
"When congress passed the Clean Water Act in 1972, states were given primary
authority to set their own standards for their water. In addition to these
standards, the act required that all state beneficial uses and their criteria
must comply with the "fishable and swimmable" goals of the act. This essentially
means that state beneficial uses must be able to support aquatic life and
recreational use. Because it is impossible to test water for every type of
disease-causing organism, states usually look to identify indicator bacteria.
An example of this is a bacterium known as faecal coliform. These indicator
bacteria suggest that a certain selection of water may be contaminated with
untreated sewage and that other, more dangerous, organisms are present. This
legislation is an important part in the fight against water pollution. They
are useful in preventing environmental catastrophes" (see the bibliography).
Main question : How can we know the quality of water ?
Hypotheses : We can know the quality of water thanks to animals that we find in the water (by analysing the proliferation and disappearance of animal species contained in this water).
For this, we have to study biological and chemical characteristics of water.
Experiments protocols:
We will do two different lists of protocols to evaluate the quality of water.
In the first list we will evaluate the content of minerals and in the second
list we look for the animals which live in four different aquatic environments
: a heap of manure (water which form a pool in the farmyard), a pond, a lake
and a river just next to a field and so polluted by fattening food.
|
As for the pH, we took 5mL of water and we added three
drop of the pH indicator. Then we had to wait for five minutes and we
watched what colour it turned into. We placed the sample on a colour
scale to compare and to evaluate the content of pH. Here, we have pH
= 6 to 7,5 : it is a neutral pH, so a good pH.
|
![]() |
![]() |
As for calcium Ca2+, if the water which runs in the ground is rich in
mineral salts, water which has a lot of salts is hard : 1°d = 10mg/L of
CaO = 17,8mg/L CaCO3 = 7,2mg/L MgO . So we have to add chloride hydroxide HCl (0,1N) , then the blue water becomes yellow water and each HCl drop indict 0,36mmol/L of carbonate CO32- then of Ca (because Ca2+ like to be associated with CO32-) |
|
As for ammonium NH4+, we added 10 drops of the first
ammonium indicator and then we added one tiny spoonful of the second
indicator. We waited for 5 minutes and we added of third indicator.
After 5 other minutes we compared the sample's colour with the scale
of colour.
|
![]() |
![]() |
As for the nitrite NO2-, in the sample, we added one tiny spoonful of the nitrite's indicator. After 5 minutes we compared the sample's colour to the scale. |
|
As for nitrate NO3-, we added
one tiny spoonful of the nitrate's indicator to the sample. After 5
minutes we placed it on the scale.
|
![]() |
| We also looked for the oxygen content with another compact laboratory: we took a sample of the water in a covered flask. We did this very carefully because we had to have water without any bubbles of air. | |
![]() Then we added five drops of manganese sulphate and sodium hydroxide. |
![]() The sample turned orange. |
![]() One minute later, we added ten drops of sulphuric acid, we put the top back on and we shook the flask. |
![]() In a little glass we filled 5mL of the sample and we added one drop of the fourth reagent. The solution turned purple. |
![]() |
Then we took a syringe titrimetric which we filled
until the graduation 0mL of titrating solution. We added the solution
in the sample until it became colourless. We noticed that we needed
0.76mL of the titrating solution. This quantity is proportional to the
oxygen concentration.
|
Since all natural waterways contain bacteria and nutrients, almost any
waste compounds introduced into such waterways will initiate biochemical
reactions (which will be shown later). Those biochemical reactions create
what is measured in the laboratory as the Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD).
The so-called 5-day BOD measures the amount of oxygen consumed by biochemical
oxidation of waste contaminants in a 5-day period. The total amount of oxygen
consumed when the biochemical reaction is allowed to proceed to completion
is called the Ultimate BOD. The Ultimate BOD is too time consuming, so the
5-day BOD has almost universally been adopted as a measure of relative effect
of pollution.
We measured the content of oxygen in each sample in the dark (to stop photosynthesis
of micro algae) at 15°C for five days, the temperature of the water was
15°C with apressure of 1bar, if we changed the temperature or the pressure,
the results would change too.
![]() The pond |
For a long time the testing of the quality of the water
has only been done using analytical chemistry. The quality of the water can be determined by the presence or absence, condition and number of the types of plants, fish, insects and algae. These types of organisms are called biological indicators, or for short: bio-indicators. |
| We visited the area and recorded general impressions of the water and surrounding area. We looked for organisms living in aquatic vegetation and in mud. We brought at least two buckets for collecting water. We used one for sorting critters from the water and mud, and then transferred them to a second bucket filled with clear water. Good indicators of water quality are the small plants and animals who live here. |
![]() The lake |
![]() |
We used a net which made the water turn cloudy in order to gather animals and plants in a little bottle in the various waters. The more important are benthic macroinvertebrate. Benthic means bottom dwelling: animals which are in sediments and debris at the bottom of a pond or lake. Macro means that the animal is big enough to be seen without a microscope. Invertebrate describes a whole group of critters without internal backbones, unlike you and I. |
After we returned to school, we looked at the benthic macroinvertebrates
that the different waters contained and put their name in a determination
key. To see plankton which is micro plants and micro invertebrates, we used
a microscope. We had to count each species but not each animal to use biotic
index, so his or her identification had to be precise.
A definition of bio-monitoring is to map the conditions of water by taking
samples and analysing the organisms which are found, just like we have done
in the other experiments.
Another part of bio-indication is bio-monitoring. In stead of looking at
which organisms are living in the water, the temperature and the pressure
at the time of the experiments are very important. Indeed the organisms
belonging to a certain type of water change with these indicators. Our sample
and our experiments have been made in October. For example, we wouldn't
be able to see what kind of animals are in what type of water because it
is winter and so it is too cold. Animals are dead. To get correct results,
it is advisable to do several experiments.
Results in France and in Netherlands
Chemical contents of the French water samples :
For our first sample which comes from manure, looking at the colour
that the sample became we could find out their contents.
For the pH, we placed the sample on the colour scale and the colour corresponded
to the content of 8,2.
For the calcium: we counted the number of droops we added to the sample until
the water turned from blue to yellow. And we found 1,08 mmol/L of CO32-
which correspond to 1,08 mmol/L of Ca2+.
For ammonium: the sample's colour corresponded to 5mg/L.
For nitrate: the sample's colour corresponded to 25mg/L.
For nitrite: the colour of the sample corresponded to 0,05mg/L.
For oxygen we needed 0.20mL of titrating solution. We must multiply it by
10 to find out the content of oxygen. So the content of oxygen is 2mg/L.
For BOD we obtained 5mgO2/L, so a little concentration.
The results of the water from a pond are: 6,8 for the pH ; 1,8mmol/L
for the calcium, 0mg/L for the ammonium, 0mg/L for the nitrate, 0mg/L/ for
the nitrite, 7.6mg/L/ for the oxygen and 5mgO2/L for
the BOD.
The results of the water from the lake are: 7 for the pH, 2,16mmol/L
for the calcium, 5mg/L for the ammonium, 0 mg/L for the nitrate, 0,5mg/L for
the nitrite, 7mg/L for the oxygen and 20mgO2/L for
the BOD so a normally concentration.
The results of the water from the river are: 6,5 for the pH, 2,52mmol/L
for the calcium, 9mg/L for the ammonium, 68mg/L for the nitrate, 3,7mg/L for
the nitrite, 6,5mg/L for the oxygen and 25mgO2/L for
the BOD.
| In the water which came from the manure we found many mosquito
larvae (between 1 to 10mm). When we came back, we saw many bacteria in microscope (nearly 2µm). |
![]() |
![]() |
|
In the water which came from a pond :
![]() twelve species of stonefly nymph (insect plecoptera, 2-4cm) |
![]() twelve species of mayfly nymph (insect ephemera, 2-3cm) |
![]() ten species of caddisfly larvae (insect, 2-3cm) |
four copepod (shellfish, 2mm) |
one philodina (rotifer, 0,1mm) |
two species of chlorococcales (green algae, 0,1mm) |
five species of dobsonfly larvae |
two ulothricales, (filamentous algae, 2mm large) |
four diatoms, (unicellular, 0,1mm) |
one Filina (rotifer 0,1mm) |
two euglenophytas (unicellular green algae, 0,1mm) |
two species of chlorococcales (unicellular green algae, 0,1mm) |
In the water which came from the river next to the field, we found
the same animals as in the water which came from the manure. We also found
lots of unicellular algae like ciliata and euglenophyta:
In the Netherlands:
Our colleagues have taken a sample of water of :
=> Dead branch, not running water in which they found five Copepoda, one
ciliata and three Euglenophyta
=> A canal in which they found two Peridinae (which are diatom), two Copepod,
three species of Chlorococcales, one Rotifer, two Euglenophyta and two species
of Diatom.
=> The river The Dommel in which they found five Peridinae, one Chlorococcale,
two Euglenophyta and three species of Diatom.
Chemical contents of the French water samples :
Specialists estimate that water quality depends on mineral concentration.
These factors are physical and chemical. As we took our samples in September,
the temperature (about 15°C) and pressure were the same for all, so we will
study only chemical factors :
|
Quality
|
Really good
|
Good
|
Middle
|
Bad
|
Really bad
|
|
|
Ammonium(mg/L)
|
From 0 to 0,1
|
From 0,1 to 0,5
|
From 0,5 to 2
|
From 2 to 8
|
8 and more
|
|
|
Nitrate(mg/L)
|
From 0 to 50
|
From 50 to 100
|
100 and more
|
|||
|
Nitrite(mg/L)
|
From 0 to 0,1
|
From 0.1 to 0,3
|
From 0,3 to 1
|
From 1 to 2
|
2 and more
|
|
|
Oxygen(mg/L)
|
7
|
From 7 to 5
|
From 5 to 3
|
3 and less
|
||
|
BOD(mgO2/L)
|
From 0 to 3
|
From 3 to 5
|
From 5 to 10
|
From 10 to 25
|
25 and more
|
|
|
We observe two effects : The net reaction is the difference between the two, it's characteristic of water quality. |
![]() |
|
|
Quality biotic index
|
Really good 10-9 | Good 8-7 | Middle 6-5 | Bad 4-3 | Really bad 2-0 |
| 1st : stonefly nymph mayfly nymph | From 11 to 16 species | from 2 to 8 species | 0 species | 0 species | 0 species |
| 2nd : ephemera larvae, caddisfly larvae, damselfly nymph, dragonfly nymph | 16 and more species | from 6 to 15 species | from 1 to 5 species | 0 species | 0 species |
| 3rd : snail (viviparus, valvata, gyraulus), leech dendrocoeleum, dobsonfly larva | 0 species | from 11 to 15 species | from 2 to 10 species | 0 species | 0 species |
| 4th : leech, scud, Physella (clam) | 0 species | 16 and more species | from 6 to 15 species | From 1 to 5 species | 0 species |
| 5th : psychoda larvae | 0 species | 0 species | from 11 to 15 sp | from 2 to 10 sp | 1 specie |
| 6th : midge fly larva, chironomidae | 0 species | 0 species | 0 species | From 6 to 10 species | from 1 to 5 species |
| 7th : eristalomia, horsefly larvae, mosquito larva | 0 species | 0 species | 0 species | 0 species | from 1 to 10 species |
| Group I: organisms are sensible to eutrophication. They are
selective carnivores and detritivores tubicoles. They die when the organisms
concentration goes up because oxygen concentration goes down. Group II: organisms are indifferent to eutrophication, carnivores and necrophages are less selective, that is to say they eat what is available to them! |
![]() |
Group III is organisms who live in mud, they are detritivores and
they show water that has too much organic matter.
Group IV contains little detritivore organisms who live for less
than one year.
Group V contains only detritivores that eat mud.
The other animals found are only visible with a microscope, so they don't
belong to the board of biotic index created to be used during a day out.
Nevertheless, they have the same needs as the invertebrates visible to the
naked eye.
As for the first sample: In water polluted by dead organic matters,
there is an active decomposition time where bacteria multiply. They break
down the organic matter with an enormous oxygen consumption. According to
the amount of oxygen as available in the water, bacteria changes organic
matters into mineral matters. Animals which can survive without much oxygen
are animals corresponding to the fifth and sixth groups with a biotic index
of 1-2. They are detritivores, smaller tolerant organisms, they cut dead
organic matter as little as it will be dissolved, indispensable state to
absorption by bacteria.
If all of the oxygen is consumed, it is the septic time where anaerobic
bacteria, which can live without oxygen, will form reducing molecules. There
is a large variety of bacteria in water polluted by fermentable organic
matters. Some species degrade cellulose, starch, lipid or protein; some
others use the decomposed products of these matters. These animals stop
to respire but they can survive because they practice fermentation.
| The other animals asphyxiate and die except insect larvae like mosquito
larvae or some small worms as Tubifex or Limndrilus which proliferate,
air breathing thanks to a long respiratory siphon. This corresponds
to the seventh group with the biotic index 0. For the same reason, pulmonate snails can survive. Also, We can see in this water quality filamentous algae (Cladopora) and a lot of bacteria (Sphaerotilum) |
![]() |
As for the second sample: It comes from a pond, dead water area
only renovated by rain. After two months of dryness, the water almost corresponded
to the water which comes from the manure. Here we can see an organic pollution
which will become a mineral pollution: this water is progressively overloaded
by mineral salts. It results in a growth of nitrates which enables the phytoplankton
and the aquatic plants proliferation. The chlorophyll concentration measure
gives a good indication of eutrophication intensity (high biologic production).
During this summer, the oxygen concentration decreases. The ecological condition
will become similar to those in current water after organic pollution which
will be layered by fermentation. The pond will evolve into the septic zone.
The number of aquatic larvae, which only lives in clean water, will decrease;
contrary to mosquito larvae.
A month later, after a week of rain, we returned to this pond. We had clean
water thanks to the self-treatment which restores the water's good characteristics.
We passed to a better biotic index, between seven and eight. When the organic
nutritive matters become less concentrated, the density of bacteria population
will decrease. The animals which need more oxygen will be able to increase.
We can observe green alga as Spirogyra and some colony of phytoflagelle.
With the increase of oxygen concentration, created by the photosynthesis
and reventilation by rain, animals appear in the order of the grid in according
to their sensitivity. When the self-treatment has ended, really good conditions
are restored and we can see clean water fauna: stoneflies and caddisfly
larvae which build a wall of twigs to protect itself, nonpulmonate snails,
daphnia... The biotic index is really good, 7-10, with a majority of animals
of the first and second groups.
Our third sample comes from a lake which is a semi-enclosed water
renovated by a little river. Lakes are characterized by large still water
surfaces. Their volume is considerable, compared to their slow flow. The
consequence is that their renewal and their oxygenation are slow but enough
if there is no pollution. The sample is characterized by a poor presence
of minerals and by the presence of insect larva which correspond to fairly
oxygenated water: dragonfly nymph, damselfly nymph are numerous. This water
has a biotic index between five and eight.
With a geologic time scale, lakes will ineluctably disappear by packing,
because of matters coming from the side basin and of the phenomenon linked
with the increase in the number of plants and other organisms which live
there.
Our fourth sample comes from a river near a field. We can observe the same animals as in the pond which came from the manure. Rain washed off fields: nitrate fertilizer flows in the river, that's a major source of water pollution. As a result of extensive cultivation of vegetables with chemical fertilizers, human beings have more than doubled the annual fixation into a biologically available form. This has occurred due to the detriment of aquatic habitats. The minerals, brought by the flow, feed the plants. In the same way, in this river, bacteria turn organic matters into minerals salt which make plants grow too much and so animals haven't enough oxygen during the night and die.
In running water, an intermingling homogenizes the natural or polluted contents all the time. This creates a better oxygenation so the pollution disappears quicker.
With all these information we can conclude that communities are composed of two or more populations of organisms adapted to a particular habitat. Organisms are genetically adapted to environmental factors. However, populations within a community may not share the exact same tolerance distribution as other community members. When change occurs in the habitat, some populations will be resistant to the change while others will be more sensitive. Every organism has, to be healthy and reproduce successfully, his own particular requirements for the environment he lives in. One organism can live very well in water with properties where the other organism can't live in.
| They used a different biotic index with four groups instead of seven groups. It is the quotient of Dresscher and Van Der Mark, that shows the measure of pollution with a formula : |
3D+C-B-3A
|
|
A+B+C+D
|
|
Indicator group
|
Water quality
|
Results of the formula
|
|
A. Ciliata
|
Extremely polluted
|
-3 to -1,2
|
|
B. Euglenophyta
|
Much polluted
|
-1,2 to 0
|
|
C. Diatomae, Chlorococcales
|
Moderately polluted
|
0 to 1,2
|
|
D. Conjugatae, Peridinae, Chrysophyceae
|
Almost not polluted
|
1,2 to 3
|
|
Place
|
Number of species in indicator group
|
Result of the formula
|
Water quality
|
|||
|
A
|
B
|
C
|
D
|
|||
|
Canal (NL)
|
0
|
2
|
4
|
1
|
0,714
|
Moderate polluted
|
|
Dead branch (NL)
|
1
|
2
|
0
|
0
|
- 1,67
|
Extremely polluted
|
|
River Dommel (NL)
|
1
|
2
|
5
|
1
|
0,33
|
Moderately polluted
|
|
Small river (FR)
|
0
|
2
|
4
|
0
|
0,33
|
Moderately polluted
|
|
Pond (FR)
|
0
|
0
|
2
|
0
|
1
|
Moderately polluted
|
So we can see that if humans don't add pollution to natural water, nature
is able to clean itself alone. That's what the Dutch also said to us:
"Nature is able to clean the water. Nature does this with the help of micro-organisms.
Micro-organisms can clear the waste of other organisms. Micro-organisms
are for example bacteria, virus and other animals that consist of one cell.
The micro-organisms use the waste as food. They break off the waste products
to water and carbonic acid gas. These waste products are organic, for example
rests of dead animals and plants."
So we can see that there is a natural cycle which permits to nature to stay
clean enough and so allows animals and plants to live in.
| A pond, a lake, or a river are oligotrophic systems, that is to say non productive. If rates of photosynthesis and respiration are low, BOD is bigger than oxygen gain, water will be bad. If rates of photosynthesis and respiration are high, we have a productive eutrophic system. Oxygen depletion and nutriment enrichment increase in detritivores, heterotrophic smaller and tolerant organisms. |
![]() |
| When chemical or organic concentrations change in natural conditions
: =>the blue population accepts large changes but there are few species. =>the black population only lives in specific concentrations and so the population size is higher. |
![]() |
![]() |
When chemical or organic concentrations change by adding of exogenous materials (that is to say materials which come from outside), generally, all the populations are affected in the same way: when the concentration of the pollutant is farther than the range of tolerance, the population size decreases brutally. The black one more sensitive and die with a smaller concentration. |
Populations interact with one another within a community and
with the ecosystem such that any change at the population level will cause
alterations in the community or ecosystem level. The effect will be determined
by the magnitude of change.
The net result of any change outside the range of tolerance for any member
of the community is either loss of an ecosystem component or structural and/or
functional replacement by more tolerant organisms. It can be expected that
food webs and energy-flow will be altered.
Benthic macroinvertebrates are good storytellers, especially when it comes
to water quality. They are sensitive to both physical and chemical changes
in the water. Although fast enough to escape predators, they can't swim away
from pollution. They tolerate it, but only to a certain point when they get
sick and die. Some criterions are more tolerant and even flourish as the water
quality declines, while others die or disappear with the slightest change.
The saying "the more the merrier" applies to benthic macroinvertebrates as
well. The greater the variety that lives in any body of water, the healthier
it is.
We can see that the excess of mineral or dead organic matter concentration
provokes the excess of plant production. In aquatic environments, enhanced
growth of choking aquatic vegetation or phytoplankton disrupts normal functioning
of the ecosystem, causing a variety of problems. If bacteria BOD increases
too much, oxygen concentration decrease in proportion and animals die. And
after, there is not much oxygen for bacteria so they denitrificate in place
of nitrificate. It is the beginning of an end, plants will die too. This evolution
is named dystrophication. In newspapers, the word "eutrophication" is always
used in place of dystrophication.
Human society also has an impact on: dystrophic conditions that decrease the
value of the resources of rivers, lakes, and estuaries such that recreation,
fishing, hunting, and aesthetic enjoyment are hindered. For example, toxic
bacteria, Cyanobacteria create cyano- compounds, poisonous salts, deadly to
many animals and all mammals. Different dystrophic evolutions are explained
in the annex.
To conclude, if you have determined the habitat of an organism, you can, the
other way round, by determining organisms, say what the qualities of the water
are.
Widening of the subject:
In France:
Factories of the production of drinking water treat water which comes from
rivers and from underground water. These waters are relatively clear. So what
all citizens must do is to try to economise water and to pollute it less.
To economise water people can privilege shower than bath (a bath take between
150 and 200L of water whereas a shower take between 30 and 80L), shorten their
shower, repair all equipment which leak, not let the tap run when you brush
your teeth, use the washing machine only when it's full, use a bowl to wash
up and water plants during the night or the evening to avoid evaporation.
To economise water people can privilege shower than bath (a bath take between
150 and 200L of water whereas a shower take between 30 and 80L), shorten their
shower, repair all equipment which leak, not let the tap run when you brush
your teeth, use the washing machine only when it's full, use a bowl to wash
up and water plants during the night or the evening to avoid evaporation.
A law requires that all buildings are joined to a system of a collective purifying
in order to make the collection of used water easier. These waters are forward
by canalisation, collectors, station of recovery, wells of interconnection
between different sewers.
For example, the law on water of January third 1992 imposed a development
of the systems of collection and used water treatment. Moreover, the government
imposed on the industries a rate of pollution not to overshoot. Nowadays,
20200 cultural installations respect the norms in France.
Stations of purification of used water are at the end of the system of collect.
Water is considered clean enough when pollutants are taken off or destroyed.
The station uses chemical, physical and biological proceedings like the destruction
of pollutants by bacteria, which digest these substances and agglomerate into
mud of purification, which we can also recover by allowing. We have a station
of purification called "biological" because only the micro-organisms participate
in the destruction of pollutants.
There are primary treatments: the goal is to eliminate the biggest wastes,
which could constrain the next treatments. The steal grate: used water goes
through grating which take off the biggest wastes like bottle or wood. The
sifting: water goes through gratings with smaller spacing of the rails, which
take off smaller wastes. The disable and de-oiling: water stay in basin during
a long time for the sand to fall at the seat and for the grease to float.
Then the sand is pumped and the grease is scoured at the surface.
Then pollutants are digested by micro-organisms like in nature but more rapidly
because of the selection and the concentration of bacterium in the basins.
| They survey a few different aspects, namely the chemical water-quality,
the biological water-quality and the quality of water that we can swim
in. When these organisations notice that the water quality is declining, they will alert the government, so they can take measures. |
![]() |
There is also an international hall-mark, the Blue Flag. In the Netherlands,
they use this hall-mark. The hall-mark is being handed over after the water
has been approved, that means that the water is clean enough to swim in.
"For a decade people dumped their waste water in the nearest brook and nature
itself took care of the rest. But when the number of habitants increased,
the ground- and surface water got too much polluted. That affected the ability
of water to clean itself.
That's why in the 20e century the government decided that they should give
nature a hand. They developed a system which imitated the biological purification
process.
The waste water that first leaves your house goes through the sewer to a
water purification plant. There they pump it up, where after the water can
be cleaned in three steps.
The first step is the mechanical purification. With a steal grate the 'big'
pieces of trash are filtered out of the water first. Then the water goes
to a sand catcher. The sand and fat that is caught from the water here is
recycled for road-building. Meanwhile the water streams calmly to the pre-sedimentation
tank, where the rest of the floating material is kept from the water. The
silt from the base of the tank is carried down to the silt thickener. The
waste silt gets burned. In some purification systems there is no pre-sedimentation
tank and the water is immediately biologically cleaned.
The second step is the biological purification. The water is put into water
basins which contain many bacteria just as in natural brooks. The bacteria
break up waste products. Meantime, while that is getting taken care of the
bacteria's get enough oxygen for instant blowing of air from the bottom
of the basins or by using surface aerators. Because of the oxygen, the bacteria's
keep moving and can't sink in, which is necessary in this stage of purification.
The last step is the after-sedimentation. The water streams slowly from
the middle to the outside, over the edge of the after-sedimentation tank.
The bacteria's are so heavy from eating the waste that they sink to the
bottom. There they are caught and a big part of them goes back to the water
basins. The cleaned water can go straight to a brook or a river.
They do use nature in their water purification plants. This is called biological
purification. During biological purification micro-organisms, especially
bacteria, clean water. They break off organic material, nitrates and phosphates.
There is aerobic and anaerobic biological purification. Aerobic purification
means that the bacteria that clean the water need oxygen for the process.
Anaerobic purification is without oxygen."
So we can see that in France and in the Netherlands, the stations of purification
work approximately in the same way.
The measures taken by the state:
- The state takes all action to change agriculture methods into biological
ones.
- To intensify the use of renewable sources of energy in transports and
electricity production.
- To reduce the use of the motor vehicle.
- To encourage local councils to stamp organic wastes.
- The state takes measures for industries to treat their own used water.
- To avoid the use of chlorine even as a disinfectant for drinking water.
- To use detergent without phosphate.
- Doctors, surgeons and veterinary must reduce the use of antibiotics.
- The state finances research about the consequences of the exposition of
pharmaceutical products in water reserves and pawns some preventive actions
about the reliability of the results.
- To reduce urbanisation and create "green belt".
- The wastes of human's origin are not mixed with chemical wastes to be
recycled.
- To build biological factories of treatment instead of chemical factories.
- The state should financially help the developing countries for the system
of evacuation and treatment of used water.
- It should distribute educational programs about the consequences of the
pollution of water and the building of stopping places to reduce it for
the industries, farmers and citizens.
|
Dossier de Renard sur l'eau : clef de détermination de la microfaune et flore, stations d'épuration "Eléments d'écologie" written by François Ramade : écologie
appliquée . |
![]() |
Annexe :
Excessive eutrophication examples :
Dystrophication will be the right word for excessive eutrophication!
When
eutrophication increases, we can notice changes of the organic composition
because of the fermentation and the lack of oxygen : some anaerobic bacteria
species live in the water without oxygen or in reducing silt and produce
methane by hydrogen and carbon molecules deterioration with a simple structure.
In areas poor in oxygen or without it, we can see some sulfobacteria, such
as Desulfovibrio desulphuricans, which reduce sulphide sulphates and produce
hydrogen sulphide.
Other anaerobic bacteria metabolize nitrogen compounds and emit ammoniac.
Some bacteria species, which feed decomposed organic matters, which, proliferate
in polluted waters, gather in a large colony, with a visible gelatinous
and stringy shape. As for the Sphaerotibus natans: a heterotrophic bacterium
common in waters polluted by carbohydrate organic matters, because it uses
sugar as its main nutrition.
Beggiatoa alba is a sulfobacterium which lives in anaerobic silt in contact
with water not completely devoid of oxygen by organic pollution: they need
hydrogen sulphide and oxygen.
Numerous species of anaerobic sulfobacterium proliferate in water loaded
with organic matters. Nevertheless, this kind of water also contains rich
flora of fungi.
Contrary to the heterotrophic bacteria, the autotrophic bacteria help to
carry oxygen to the waters.
When the oxygen levels increase at a suitable rate, we could see bacteria,
which transform ammonia into nitrates.
The apodya lacteal brings mycelium colony that look like fleecy filament.
This species needs a sufficient quantity of oxygen and organic nitrogen.
The fusarium aqueductum is a red fungi living in waters that are rich in
organic matter.
A lot of others fungi species such as Mucor, Geotrichum, Penicillium...
proliferate in waters and are infected by biochemical matters.
The metabolic needs of these organisms caused a huge drop of dissolved organic
content.
In the active decomposition zone and in those nearby the downstream part,
when the self-treatment start to show a result, ecological conditions are
favourable to the proliferation of unicellular animals, because many of
these species eat bacteria. In the deterioration zone, only very resistant
microorganisms and a few flagellated can develop. But after this zone, Colpidium,
Glaucoma, Penicilium, and sessile species (Carchesium, Epistylis) with a
bacterium regime, proliferate.
Algae totally disappear from waters deoxygenated by an organic pollution.
However, if the oxygen level stays sufficient, algae first decrease, and
then grow. The proliferation of these autotrophic organisms results in the
release of nitrates and phosphate by the bacteria, from organic matters
present in the effluent.
The maximum density of alga phytocoenose is located near the beginning of
the effluent emission. Species which proliferate there are adapted to rich
in nutritive element areas: Oscillatoria, Phormidium (blue alga), Ulothrix
(green alga), Euglena (phytoflagelle). In waters overloaded with nitrates,
we can often observe a green alga Stigeoclonium.
Some Melosira and diatoms such as Gomphonema and Nitzschia paela meet each
other in abundance, even in active decomposition zone, with sometimes species
as Navicula and Surirella. The Cladophora Glomerata green alga often lives
in rich in nutritive element areas. This specie proliferates when the degree
of organic matters which turn into minerals is reached. It floats with a
branched filament shape, larger than two metres.